Wikinews:保护方针
管理员拥有保护页面的权限,以避免文章被编辑或是图像被覆盖,这个功能只能被使用在被破坏的页面、编辑战和根据存档方针而使用,我们作出上述限制,因为受保护的页面通常都被认为是有害。
保护也可用于保护页面,防止移动。
若要请求保护页页,请到管理员通告板提交请求。
目录 |
用途 [编辑]
永久保护用于:
临时保护用于:
- 根据请求对编辑战实施一段时间的强制冷却
- 页面或图片近期被封禁使用者进行顽固破坏或顽固编辑
The protection of a page on any particular version is not meant to express support for that version and requests should therefore not be made that the protected version be reverted to a different one.
管理员建议 [编辑]
This does not cover articles which are being archived, but articles which are being protected for any other reason.
- Don't edit or revert a temporarily protected page except to add a protected page notice, or add dispute tags
- Do not protect a page you are involved in a dispute over
- Add {{protected}} (or {{vprotected}} for vandalism) to the top of the temporarily protected page and make mention of the protection in the edit summary
- Encourage resolution between the disputing parties
- Unprotect pages as soon as possible, removing {{protected}} (or {{vprotected}} for vandalism) from the top the page and make mention of the removal in the edit summary.
Admins should not protect pages which they have been involved with (involvement includes making substantive edits to the page or expressing opinions about the article on the talk page). Admin powers are not editor privileges - admins should only act as servants to the user community at large. If you are an admin and you want a page in an edit war in which you are somehow involved to be protected, you should contact another admin and ask them to protect the page for you.
In addition, admins should avoid favouring one version of the article over another, unless one version is vandalised.
In general, temporarily protected pages should not be protected for long.
There is no need to protect personal CSS and js pages like user/monobook.css or user/cologneblue.js. Only the account associated with these pages is able to edit them.
参见 [编辑]
- 管理员通告板 - 请求保护、解除保护与文章编辑。
- 保护日志
- Category:Protected
来源 [编辑]
保护方针是基于Wikipedia:页面保护方针。